Summary: Singers with in-ear rarely experience problems with latency up to 4ms, after that it drops rapidly and at 8ms 50% experience difficulty singing. In contrast, keyboardists can handle a latency up to almost 40ms without experiencing problems.
Contact us if you need help!
Description
In the world of live music, every millisecond counts. Digital audio equipment has revolutionized the way we produce and amplify sound, but it comes with a hidden challenge: latency. The slight delay between when a sound is created and when a musician hears it can deeply affect their performance. But what if we told you that your instrument could be the biggest factor in how much latency you can handle?
A study from Purdue University and Shure delved into this very question, conducting listening tests with professional musicians on different instruments and with different latency settings. And the results are probably not quite what you think...
One of the most striking findings is that a musician's sensitivity to latency depends primarily on the instrument they play, not their individual listening skills. This means that a keyboardist can tolerate significantly more latency than a singer, even if both are highly trained professionals. For example, keyboardists consistently showed the highest tolerance for latency, probably because they are used to synth sounds with built-in delays. Singers, on the other hand, proved to be very sensitive, especially with in-ear monitors.
If you use in-ear monitors (IEMs), listen carefully: the study found that IEMs generally require much lower latency to achieve the same perceived quality compared to traditional stage monitors (wedges). This is because IEMs eliminate the natural acoustic delay you get from a speaker on stage, making digital latency artifacts more noticeable.
Interestingly, for some musicians using IEMs, a small amount of latency (around 1.4 ms) was actually preferable to no latency at all. This suggests that a small, controlled delay can mimic the natural acoustic environment and improve comfort. The study also found that playing with a non-delayed metronome (simulating a tape) could make some latency preferable to none, which is consistent with research suggesting an optimal delay for ensemble synchronization.
To further understand these differences, the researchers developed a measure for "General Sensitivity". This tells us how likely an instrumentalist's perception of latency is to change based on different monitor conditions or subjective criteria.
Instead of a one-size-fits-all solution, the future of professional audio system design needs to be instrument-aware and context-sensitive.
Ultimately, by recognizing the unique ways that different instruments and monitor settings interact with latency, we can create more enjoyable live performances for everyone on stage.
If you would like to read the full report, it is attached below.